Legal Opinion

Bel Air Internet, LLC v. Morales

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 26, 2018No. B270268PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLui, P. J.

*928This appeal requires us to consider the role of the pleadings and supporting declarations in deciding a motion to strike under the anti-SLAPP

*929statute ( Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16 ).1 Section 425.16 protects the exercise of certain constitutional rights by permitting a motion to strike when a complaint targets specified conduct that *75involves the right to freedom of speech or the right to petition the government. When a plaintiff's complaint shows that a claim arises from communications that are protected under the statute, must the defendant support a motion to strike with declarations…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Laker v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Lezlie Gunn v. Christine DrageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. Korman v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. Rudisill v. Cal. Coastal Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Abir Cohen Treyzon Salo, LLP v. LahijiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API