Legal Opinion
In Re Hook
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 14, 2006No. 06-BG-374PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
On December 15, 2005, the Maryland Court of Appeals suspended the respondent, Steven R. Hook, from the practice of law for ninety days, effective January 17, 2006. The respondent was suspended as the result of a Joint Petition for Suspension by Consent which he filed with the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland. The respondent stipulated that sufficient evidence existed to support his violations of Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct 1.3 (diligence), 1.4 (failure to communicate), 5.3 (inadequate supervision of non-legal employees), 8.1(b) (knowing failure to respond to a lawful…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re SusmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re WeekesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In re Dana W. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In Re Mba-JonasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- IN RE DANA JOHNSONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016