Legal Opinion
In re Dana W. Johnson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 13, 2014No. 13-BG-1459PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Senior Judge:
This case presents the question of whether Mr. Johnson, a disbarred attorney petitioning for reinstatement, has complied with the requirement that he notify all clients of his discipline, and file an affidavit demonstrating that compliance. We conclude that he has not, and uphold the dismissal of his petition.
After the Maryland Court of Appeals disbarred petitioner Dana Johnson for conduct violating the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, 1 this court imposed reciprocal discipline disbarring Mr. Johnson from the practice of law in the District of Columbia on November…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re GardnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re FairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- In Re MaignanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- IN RE DANA JOHNSONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re Abigail AskewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- In re JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016