Legal Opinion
In Re Susman
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 9, 2005No. 00-BG-121PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The respondent, Gerald S. Susman, pleaded guilty in 1997 to the felony offense of making false statements in relation to documents required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. 1 He was sentenced to five years probation, fined $10,000, and ordered to pay $42,500 in restitution. • ■ '
After Bar Counsel informed us of respondent’s conviction and of his indefinite suspension by consent in Maryland, 2 we temporarily suspended him "pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, §§ 10(c) and 11(d). We also directed the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) to- institute a formal proceeding to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Quao Lin Dong v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SusmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SusmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SusmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re RigasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re HookDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re WeekesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In re Dana W. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- In Re LebowitzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.