Legal Opinion

East Jordan Lumber Co. v. Village of East Jordan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1894PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Mandamus. Argued January 18, 1894. Granted May 18, 1894. Relator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to levy a tax sufficient to pay the claim of relator under a contract to furnish a water supply. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an application for a mandamus to compel the respondent, by its common council, to proceed to levy a tax sufficient to pay the relator the sum of $2,249.21, due upon a contract between the relator’s assignor1 and the respondent, by which the relator’s *203assignor undertook to furnish a water supply for the prevention of fires.

The contract was made in 1888, and, in substance, provided that the lumber company should furnish, and connect with its sawmill boilers, a duplex steam fire pump, with not less than five-inch suction and four-inch discharge, and lay a five-inch wrought-iron pipe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. San Francisco Gas Co. v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Spitzer v. Village of BlanchardMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Carey v. City of East SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Nester v. BuschMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ludington Water-Supply Co. v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Central Bitulithic Paving Co. v. Village of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Webb v. Township of WakefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. American LaFrance & Foamite Industries, Inc. v. Village of CliffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Bacon v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API