Carey v. City of East Saginaw
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Sherwood, O. J.
This suit ivas brought to recover for a quantity of sewor-pipe sold and delivered by plaintiff to the defendant, or 'rather to its sewer board, acting for the city, in 1881; the balance of the account for which the plaintiff claims being $390.06, with interest, from July 15, 1881.
The declaration was upon the common counts. Plea,, general issue, with notice of recoupment, on the ground that plaintiff warranted the pipe strong and perfect, and to be made of good material, and fit for the purpose of sewer construction, whereas defendant avers that said pipe failed in all these…
2Cited by10 opinions
- City of Saginaw v. Consumers' Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Ludington Water-Supply Co. v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Central Bitulithic Paving Co. v. Village of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- East Jordan Lumber Co. v. Village of East JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- American LaFrance & Foamite Industries, Inc. v. Village of CliffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.