Legal Opinion

Webb v. Township of Wakefield

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1927No. Docket Nos. 59, 60PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

The above entitled cases arise out of alleged delinquencies of the same officers in the same township, involve the same controlling questions of law, as we view it, and will be considered together. In each case the declaration counted upon an alleged contract, upon township orders for the amount claimed under it, and also upon the common counts in assümpsit. In each case defendant pleaded the general issue with various special notices based chiefly on failure of the township officers to observe statutory provisions governing their action and limiting their authority in such matters, with a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Coit v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. East Jordan Lumber Co. v. Village of East JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Commercial State Bank v. School District No. 3Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Mackey v. Township of ColumbusMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Parker v. Township of West BloomfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. American LaFrance & Foamite Industries, Inc. v. Village of CliffordMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Diponio v. City of Garden CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Harbor Watch Condominium Association v. Emmet County TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. A. J. Smith Construction Co. v. City of Marine CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API