Legal Opinion
Central Bitulithic Paving Co. v. Village of Highland Park
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1910No. Docket No. 49PublishedCited by 20 opinions
Appeal from Wayne; Donovan, J. Bill by the Central Bitulithic Paving Company against the village of Highland Park, to restrain defendant from interfering with the performance of a contract for a public improvement. Prom a decree granting defendant affirmative relief and declaring the contract invalid, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
Complainant claims to have made a contract with the defendant to pave a street, to have entered upon the performance thereof, and to have been denied the right to continue performance and complete the contract by the action of defendant. The relief prayed for in the bill of complaint is:
“That upon the hearing of this cause a decree may be *225entered ordering and directing that a permanent writ of injunction issue out of and under the seal of this cotírt directed to the said defendant, and to its officers and agents, commanding them, and each of them, to absolutely desist and refrain from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Argus Co. v. . Mayor, Etc., of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- East Jordan Lumber Co. v. Village of East JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- City of Fort Madison v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Corliss v. Village of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Carey v. City of East SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by20 opinions
- Benton v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Dickey Oil Co. v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Bennett v. Northwestern National InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Mahoney v. LesterMontana Supreme Court · 1946
- New Haven Tile & Floor Covering Co. v. RomanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.