Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Paving Company v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 13, 1963No. 509-58PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURFEE, Judge.
This is an action for delay damages growing out of defendant’s alleged breach of contract. The contract in question was entered into November 18, 1954. Under the contract, plaintiff undertook to complete additional airfield paving and other work at the Walker Air Force Base, Roswell, .New Mexico. The total consideration was $2,072,739.61.
Under the contract, plaintiff was to commence work within ten days of receipt of the contract; to complete the work not later than 300 calendar days from the commencement date; and to “complete work within landing areas” as expeditiously as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
- Carroll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- Rogers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
- Great Lakes Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wickham Contracting Co., Inc. v. Dennis J. Fischer, Acting Administrator, General Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Joseph H. Roberts v. The United States, Great American Insurance Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Broome Construction, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Gardner Displays Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Weaver-Bailey Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.