Legal Opinion

Carroll v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 2, 1929No. C-923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGheeN, Judge

The evidence shows that the plaintiffs contracted with the defendant to install certain mechanical equipment in a building to be constructed by the Government, at Hampton Roads, Virginia. The. contract was dated March 7, 1919, and was to be completed within 120 days from the date a copy of the contract was delivered to plaintiffs, which was July 29,1919. The work in fact was not completed until September 3,1920, due principally to delay on the part of other contractors in completing other necessary preliminary work.

Plaintiffs bring this suit to recover a small unpaid balance withheld from the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. H. E. Crook Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Standard Steel Car Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  3. Carroll v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  4. H. E. Crook Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eden Isle Marina, Inc. v. the United States 0United States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. Asco-Falcon II Shipping Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  3. Rogers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  4. Gillioz v. Missouri State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API