Legal Opinion

Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. Wilmington Housing Authority

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 8, 1958No. Civ. A. 1739PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAYTON, District Judge.

The matter in dispute here arises out of a written contract for the construction by the plaintiff of two extensive low rent housing developments, known as Southbridge Extension and Eastlake Extension.

Under the provisions of 31 Del.C. § 4317, the Wilmington HousingAuthority advertised for bids. Paragraph 15 of the instructions to bidders contained the following clause:

“a. The Contracts will be awarded to the responsible bidders submitting the lowest proposal complying with the conditions of the Invitation for Bids, providing his bid is reasonable and it is to the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Patterson v. . MeyerhoferNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Mugford v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  5. Wells Brothers Co. of NY v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. City of DoverSuperior Court of Delaware · 1977
  2. Daniel B. Van Campen Corp. v. Building & Construction Trades CouncilSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1973
  4. State Highway Administration v. Greiner Engineering Sciences, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. Robley H. Evans and Julia M. Evans v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API