Legal Opinion

United States v. Speed

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 29, 1869PublishedCited by 100 opinions

By an act of 14th April, 1818,* “the.Commissary-General and his assistants shall ■ perform such duties in purchasing and issuing of rations as the President shall direct;” “supplies for the army (unless in particular and urgent .cases the Secretary of War should otherwise direct) shall be ■purchased by contract, on public notice,” &c., “ which contract shall be made under such regulations as the Secretary of War may direct.”

Read the full summary

By an act of 14th April, 1818,* “the.Commissary-General and his assistants shall ■ perform such duties in purchasing and issuing of rations as the President shall direct;” “supplies for the army (unless in particular and urgent .cases the Secretary of War should otherwise direct) shall be ■purchased by contract, on public notice,” &c., “ which contract shall be made under such regulations as the Secretary of War may direct.” One of the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War, and which made Rule No. 1179 in the Army Regulations of 1863, is thus: “ Contracts for subsistence stores shall…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

The counsel for the appellant urges eight separate objections to this judgment, which we must notice in the order they are presented.

1. Pork-packing and curing bacon is not a business within the scope of the powers of the Secretary of War, or his subordinates.

If by this is meant that the War Department has no authority to enter into the business of converting hogs into pork, lard, and bacon, for purposes of profit or sale as individuals do, the proposition may be conceded. But, if ,it is intended to deny to the department this mode of procuring supplies when it may be the only sufficient…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. MottSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. StimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  3. Ross and Morrison v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1816

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. College Point Boat Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
  5. United States v. Purcell Envelope Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API