Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc. v. Housing Authority
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtCapotosto, J.
These are cross actions in assumpsit which were tried together in the superior court without a jury. Hereinafter Psaty & Fuhrman, Inc., a New York corporation, will be referred to as the contractor, and The Housing Authority of the City of Providence, Rhode Island, a public body organized under the laws of this state, as the Authority. The trial justice rendered a decision for the plaintiff contractor in the sum of $88,921.21, which included $10,921.67 as interest from the date of its writ, and for the plaintiff Authority in the sum of $75,600. Only the contractor has duly prosecuted a bill…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wise v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Patterson v. . MeyerhoferNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Broadway Maintenance Corp. v. RutgersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Gorman v. GormanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Long v. Atlantic PBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Airfreight Express Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Housing Authority of City of Dallas v. HubbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.