Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 14, 2010No. 200504235; A138064PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment revoking probation and imposing sentence consisting of a term of incarceration and a term of post-prison supervision (PPS) totaling 94 months. He argues that the sentence that the trial court imposed is unlawful because the total period of incarceration and PPS exceeds the statutory 60-month limit that applies to the offense on which he was sentenced and because the PPS term is indeterminate. We agree with defendant, vacate the sentence, remand for resentencing, and otherwise affirm.

The relevant facts are few and undisputed. Defendant was charged with one count…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. TremillionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. StalderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. AkersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. SwinneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API