Legal Opinion

State v. Stalder

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 19, 2006No. 03C46882; A122559PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for one count of felony assault in the fourth degree. ORS 163.160(3). He argues that the trial court committed three errors that require reversal: (1) the court failed to exclude certain out-of-court statements made by a child witness to a police officer, in violation of defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to confront his accusers; (2) the court unlawfully imposed a sentence that includes an excessive and indeterminate period of post-prison supervision (PPS); and (3) the court unlawfully imposed an upward durational departure sentence based on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. United States v. Ronald Lester ParryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. KuesterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API