State v. Young

This appeal involves seven consolidated criminal cases. In five of the cases, defendant asserts that the trial court erred by imposing excessive and indeterminate post-prison supervision (PPS) terms. The state concedes that the PPS terms are excessive under OAR 213-005-0002(2)(a) and State v. Stalder, 205 Or App 126, 133 P3d 920, rev den, 340 Or 673 (2006), and the state acknowledges that the PPS terms are unlawfully indeterminate under State v. Mitchell, 236 Or App 248, 235 P3d 725 (2010). We review for errors of law. ORS 138.222(4); State v. Capri, 248 Or App 391, 394, 273 P3d 290 (2012).…