Legal Opinion

State v. Akers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 2008No. 230505268; A132100PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992(4) (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840(3) (2005), following a stipulated facts trial. He appeals, contending that the trial court erred in conducting the trial without a valid written waiver of his right to a jury trial. He concedes that he did not preserve the issue, but asks that we address it as plain error. We conclude that, on the facts of this case, the error, if any, is not plain and therefore affirm.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Defendant was charged with possession of a Schedule II…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. GornickOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. LemonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Town of Klamath Falls v. SachsOregon Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. HerringtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Harbert v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. JeantyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API