Legal Opinion

State v. Tremillion

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 1992No. C89-11-36645; CA A68242PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant pled no contest to a charge of failure to perform the duties of a driver to injured persons (felony hit and run). ORS 811.705(1). The sentencing court imposed a sentence of 15 to 18 months imprisonment, the presumptive range for grid block 6 C. Defendant argues that the court erred in not sentencing him to a definite term of imprisonment.

The state concedes that defendant is correct. OAR 253-05-001 requires a term of imprisonment “within the durational range of months stated in the grid block.” OAR 253-05-005 requires that the judgment of conviction “shall state the length of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. State v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. State v. YostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. Ignacio GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. State v. EnosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. StalderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. State v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API