Whittle v. Whittle
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Frank H. Kerrigan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff and defendant are husband and wife, but that they have been living separate and apart since August, 1893; that in November, 1893, the defendant received $1,097.60 to and for the use of plaintiff; that said money was partly the separate property of plaintiff and partly community property, and that defendant has not paid the same nor any part thereof.
The answer alleges that all the money received by the defendant was received by her as the wife of the plaintiff, and was necessarily used by her for the necessaries of life, for her board and maintenance,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- County of Sacramento v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Livingston v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Laguna Drainage District v. Charles Martin Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bastanchury v. Times-Mirror Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Remington v. LandoltOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Briggs v. Marcus-Lesoine, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Coombs v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Freitas v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.