Legal Opinion
Freitas v. Freitas
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1916No. Civ. No. 1755PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Save in one particular the facts in this ease, as shown by the pleadings and proof, are in their essential features substantially the same as those pleaded and proven in the case of Freitas v. Freitas, ante, p. 16, [159 Pac. 611], No. 1754, this day decided, the present case being different only in the particular that the beneficial society in which the deceased was insured had upon the death of the deceased paid to the defendants the sum of one thousand five hundred dollars, called for by the policy of insurance. As a consequence the society was not made a party defendant. Judgment…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Board of Highway Commissioners v. City of BloomingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
- Freitas v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- County of Colusa v. County of GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Kreutz v. LivingstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Whittle v. WhittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Irvine v. MacGregorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Coombs v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Biurrun v. ElizaldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923