Laguna Drainage District v. Charles Martin Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Marin County, and from an order denying a new trial. Thomas J'. Lennon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.
Action for condemnation. Plaintiff recovered judgment. Defendant has appealed from the judgment, the order denying its motion for a new trial, and an order allowing plaintiff possession of the property pending the appeal.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff is a public corporation created for the purpose of draining a part of the lands of the state included within the boundaries of the drainage district as set forth in the complaint; that it is necessary for the purposes of draining the said district to cut down and excavate the bed of a natural stream leading from the lower end of the said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Haldeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Foster v. Richard BusteedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Rappenecker v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Ellena v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Oakes Municipal Airport Authority v. WieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Linggi v. GarovottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Suisun Lumber Co. v. Fairfield School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.