Legal Opinion

County of Sacramento v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1899No. Sac. No. 586PublishedCited by 32 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an action to recover fifteen thousand dollars, and twenty per cent in addition thereto as damages, from the aforesaid defendants. Judgment was rendered for the amount claimed, and an appeal is now taken from that judgment and from the order denying a motion for a new trial.

The facts in substance are these: The California Pacific Bail-road Company contemplated building.a railroad bridge across the Sacramento river at Sacramento city, connecting the counties of Sacramento and Yolo. The construction of this bridge would result in the demolition of the old railroad bridge between the two…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of L.A. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Brown v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Osburn v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Contra Costa Water Co. v. BreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API