Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Guzman v. General Motors Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 12, 1984No. Civ. 30336PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, J.

Raymond Guzman was injured at work while operating a paste machine. His complaint alleged the machine was manufactured by General Motors, his employer. General Motors filed affidavits and answered a series of interrogatories, indicating it had built the machine. When General Motors later discovered Hamblen Gauge was the manufacturer, 1 it notified Guzman who moved for an order imposing sanctions, alleging the incorrect answer was intentional, an effort by General Motors, immune from suit, to shield Hamblen Gauge. Heard on the same day were General Motors’ motions for (1)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Bell v. Industrial Vangas, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Lund v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Scheiding v. Dinwiddie Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Jahn v. BrickeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Gordon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API