Legal Opinion

Lund v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1964No. L. A. No. 27892PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

An alternative writ of prohibition issued in this ease restraining respondent court from proceeding further to enforce its order requiring petitioners to make payment to several of the real parties in interest, and also restraining respondent sheriff from making levy under that order. Further review of the facts and the law demonstrates that the trial court’s order in question was beyond the juris*701diction and power of that court, and that a peremptory writ should issue.

The facts, set forth in chronological order, are as follows:

On April 4, 1958, Harry W. Saulsbery and Helen W. Saulsbery…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Adams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Twin Lock, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. In Re NyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Walker v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Fairfield v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Rao v. CampoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Jacuzzi v. Jacuzzi Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API