Los Angeles City High School District v. Schumann
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
By the filing of a complaint in the usual form the respondent began an action in eminent domain to condemn certain property of appellants for school purposes. The answer presented the value of the property as the sole issue. A trial was had before a jury. Beside the defendants a number of expert witnesses testified for each side. A verdict was rendered and judgment was entered accordingly, from which judgment this appeal is taken.
The principal ground of appeal presented is that certain instructions given are said to be erroneous. Of these instructions No. 7 is the center of attack. It reads:
“T…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hirshfeld v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Lawrence v. GoodwillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- City of San Francisco v. Tillman Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Housing Authority v. ForbesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- United States v. CraryDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.