United States v. Crary
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
McDOWELL, District Judge.
Following the filing of the opinion in this ease of May 11, 1932 ([D. C.] 1 F. Supp. 406) the United States Lumber Company has, under protest, appeared generally and has filed an answer, which embodies a number of motions.
As preliminary to what will be an unavoidably tedious discussion, it seems advisable to say here:(a) I cannot doubt the right of the government to institute an omnium gatherum condemnation suit to acquire the rights and claims of every person, known or unknown,( who has or may have a right to, or a right in, the land sought to be acquired. This…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- United States v. a Certain Tract or Parcel of LandDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1942
- United States v. 76,800 AcresDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1942
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. HarralsonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.