People v. Thompson
California Supreme Court
Holbrook, Tarr & O’Neill and Leslie R. Tarr for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
This is an eminent domain proceeding to condemn for freeway purposes approximately 17 (possibly 23) acres 1 of land (designated in the complaint and herein as Parcel 2A) out of a 100-acre tract owned by defendants. The trial court ruled that by the taking of Parcel 2A defendants became entitled not only to the value of that parcel but also to severance damages, if any, to their remaining property. A jury found that the value of Parcel 2A was $12,000; that the damages to defendants’ remaining property amounted to $17,500; and that there were no benefits to defendants’ remaining property. The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- City of Pleasant Hill v. First Baptist ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- American Savings and Loan Association, a California Corporation v. County of Marin, a Public EntityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. SilveiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.