San Diego Land & Town Co. v. Neale
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This is a proceeding to condemn land for reservoir purposes. On the former appeal (78 Cal. 63), the judgment was affirmed as to all the issues except the issue as to the value of the land. The cause was remanded for a new trial of that issue, a trial was had, and a judgment on a verdict for $122,657.50 and costs of suit was entered in favor of defendants; but the plaintiff moved for a new trial, which motion was granted, and the defendants have appealed.
It would be sufficient for us to say that as the order appealed from is one granting a new trial, and as the evidence as to the value of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Alloway v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Cent. Pac. R.R. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- L. R. Junction Ry. v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.