Legal Opinion

Mego Corp. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 14, 1974No. 74-19, C.A.D. 1137PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mxllee, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Customs Court, 71 Cust. Ct. 53, C.D. 4471 (1973), dismissing1 appellant’s action based on its complaint against the classification of its imported merchandise under item 737.90, Tariff Schedules of the United States, and the failure to classify said merchandise under item 734.20 or, alternatively, 734.15 or 735.20. We reverse and remand.

Schedule 7, Part 5, covers, among other things, Games and Toys. Subpart E provides as follows:

Subpart H headnotes:

737.90 1. The articles described in the provisions of this subpart (except parts) shall…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. F. L. Smidth & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. The United States v. Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  5. Mego Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Parksmith Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  2. Prepac, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  3. Corning Glass Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  4. Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  5. Coleco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API