Legal Opinion

Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 1, 1972No. 5449, C.A.D. 1053PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baldwin, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, Second Division,1 overruling appellant’s protest against the classification of wire stranding machines imported from England. The importations were classified under item 674.35, TSUS, as metal-working machine tools. Appellant claims that classification should have been under item 670.90, TSUS, as cordage machines.

The imported stranders are machines used in making wire rope. Individual wires to be made into a strand are received on separate bobbins which fit into the machine. The wires are drawn…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitlock Cordage Co. v. Untied StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Pacific Suppliers, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mego Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  2. Schmidt, Pritchard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  3. United States v. Avdel Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  4. Coleco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  5. United States v. Avdel Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API