United States v. Parksmith Corp.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the Customs Court, 71 Gust. Ct. 12, C.D. 4463, 365 F. Supp. 461 (1973), sustaining appellee’s claims that its imported merchandise is properly classifiable as ¡articles in chief value of lead, valued over 133/3 cents per pound, under item 657.75, Tariff Schedules of the United States. We affirm.
The imported merchandise, with one exception, was classified by the Customs Service as articles not specially provided for of a type used for household use under item 654.20. In one instance, merchandise was classified under item 653.80 as household…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eaton Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Mego Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Parksmith Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Computime, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Russ Berrie & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
- XL Specialty Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
- Andy Mohan Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.