Prepac, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, Judge:
These severed actions consolidated for the purpose of trial, involve plastic articles described on the invoices as picnic bags and designated as style nos.: 153, 154, 179, 186 and 188. The merchandise described above was classified as luggage under item 706.60, Tariff Schedules of the United States, and assessed with duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem.
Plaintiff claims said bags are not luggage, nor are they ejusdem generis with the articles enumerated in schedule 7, part 1, subpart D, headnote 2(a)(i) of the Tariff Schedules of the United States. Accordingly, it is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mego Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Standard Surplus Sales, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- United States v. Standard Surplus SalesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- SGI, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.