Legal Opinion

Corning Glass Works v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 4, 1977No. C.D. 4716. Court No. 75-8-02008PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Judge:

This action concerns the proper tariff classification for certain “Rota” ampul inspection machines imported from West Germany and entered at the port of New York in December 1973 and June 1974. The machines in question are used by pharmaceutical manufacturers to inspect sealed glass containers (ampuls or vials) filled with injectable drugs.

The Rota machines were classified by the regional commissioner of customs as “Optical measuring or checking instruments and appliances not provided for elsewhere in subpart C, D, or F of this part [part 2, schedule 7], and parts thereof: * * *…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tanross Supply Co., Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Lyons Export & Import, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  3. United States v. Ampex Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. Albert E. Price, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  5. Kotake Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Corning Glass WorksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  2. Corning Glass Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. Corning Glass Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  4. Inter-Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
  5. Conley v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API