Legal Opinion

Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 2, 1971No. C.D. 4195PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

These four protests consolidated for trial involve the tariff status of merchandise invoiced as “Mother Hen Target Game Sets” that were imported from Japan and entered at the port of New York in 1965 and 1966. Each set includes a metal target board with supporting legs, four round plastic “eggs,” three rubber-tipped plastic darts, and a spring-activated gun to fire the darts. The target board is painted with a representation of a hen in a farmyard, with a plastic egg-shaped target in the middle of the hen.

The government classified the imported sets that were entered in 1966…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Western Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mego Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  2. Mego Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. Gimbel Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  4. APF Electronics Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  5. Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API