Legal Opinion
Transit Team, Inc. v. Metropolitan Council
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 18, 2004No. A03-1344PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
Appellant Transit Team, Inc. challenges the award of the 2003-07 Metro Mobility paratransit service contract to respondent-intervenor Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc., contending that (a) the contract award is not legal because respondent Metropolitan Council failed to adopt new procurement standards as required under Minn.Stat. § 473.392 (2002); (b) even if the council could rely on procurement standards adopted by its predecessor, it substantially deviated from those standards; (c) Laid-law’s proposal was illegal and void where it substantially varied from the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Nielsen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Telephone Associates, Inc. v. St. Louis County BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011