Legal Opinion

Telephone Associates, Inc. v. St. Louis County Board

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 8, 1985No. C6-83-1295PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TODD, Justice.

Telephone Associates, Inc. submitted a bid to St. Louis County for installation of phone service. The contract was let to Norstan Communications Systems, Inc. Telephone Associates, claiming it was the lowest possible bidder, sought to enjoin the contract between Norstan and the county. The trial court denied motions for both temporary and permanent injunctions. The court of appeals reversed the trial court. We affirm the reversal of the trial court, but remand with instructions as to what relief is appropriate.

In 1982, construction of a new state office building which was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Owen of Georgia, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Shelby County Roy Nixon, Mayor of Shelby County Pidgeon-Thomas Iron Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  2. Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Nielsen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Duffy v. Village of PrincetonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Telephone Associates Inc. v. St. Louis County BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. New England Insulation Co. v. General Dynamics Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  4. Horsfield Materials, Inc. v. City of DyersvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  5. Byrd v. Independent School District No. 194Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API