Legal Opinion

Asch v. Housing and Redevelopment Authority

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 1959No. 37,741PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying plaintiffs’ motion for amended findings or in the alternative for a new trial and from the judgment entered for defendants.

This action arises out of certain proceedings of the defendant Housing and Redevelopment Authority of City of St. Paul, herein referred to as the Authority, which resulted in the condemnation, clearance, and sale of certain land located in the Western Development Area to defendant Sears, Roebuck & Co., herein referred to as Sears.

Pursuant to the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act (M. S. A.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holen v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. GreenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. HOUSING & REDEVEL. AUTHOR. OF MINNEAPOLIS v. Mpls. Metropolitan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Roberson v. RobersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Richfield Oil Corp. v. Harbor Insurance Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Merrill v. MerrillIdaho Supreme Court · 1961

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API