Legal Opinion
Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 7, 2014No. A13-1477PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOLLY, Judge.
Appellant, a longtime provider of transit services in the City of Rochester, challenges the summary-judgment dismissal of its claims arising out of the city’s solicitation of bids and acceptance of a competing bid for transit services, arguing that the district court erred by determining as a matter of law that (1) the city did not take appellant’s property without just compensation; (2) the bidding process was not unfair,, prejudicially biased, and infected with organizational conflicts of interest; (3) the bidding process did not violate appellant’s due-process…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. BreslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Turner Const. Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, First Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, First Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015