Legal Opinion

Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. Partnership

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 6, 2011No. Nos. A10-1336, A10-1505PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLLINS, Judge.*

Appellant Andrew C. Grossman challenges (1) a temporary injunction prohibit*639ing him from transferring or otherwise disposing of any proceeds that he may receive from a spendthrift trust established by his late father, and (2) the district court’s subsequent order applying the trust proceeds, as they come due, to satisfy respondent Fannie Mae’s judgment. We reverse.

FACTS

Appellant’s father established a revocable trust in 1983. The trust agreement provides, in relevant part, that upon the death of appellant’s father and after certain distributions are made, the trustee…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Van Dyke v. First National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Putz v. PutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. In Re Trust Created by MoultonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. In Re Estate of LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fannie Mae v. Heather Apartments Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API