Legal Opinion
Coller v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 21, 1947No. 34,338PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Suing as a taxpayer, plaintiff seeks to annul the award, made in competitive bidding, by defendant city of St. Paul of a contract to defendant The Dual Parking Meter Company for the purchase and installation of 1,070 parking meters and to enjoin the city and the company from entering into or performing the contract pursuant to the award.
The questions presented are (1) whether a proposal in Dual’s bid to install the meters according to the method set forth in its specifications was an alternative to the method specified by the city in its specifications or a substitute…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Molloy v. . City of New RochelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Louchheim v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- Hendricks v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Urbany v. City of CarrollSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Griswold v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Nielsen v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- R. E. Short Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Gridley v. EngelhartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.