Legal Opinion
Lindsay v. Kleiber Motor Truck Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 1930No. Docket No. 7707PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants and asked for judgment for the recovery of an automobile truck or for the value thereof in case a delivery could not be had. The defendant Maurice Haydis was not served and as to him the transaction was dismissed. The Kleiber Motor Truck Company, a corporation, answered and a trial was had before the trial court sitting without a jury. The court made findings in favor of the plaintiff and from a judgment entered thereon the corporation has appealed.
Some time prior to 1923 Maurice Haydis purchased under a conditional sales contract a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erreca v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Lininger Implement Co. v. Queen City Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Mutch v. Long Beach Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Welker v. ApplemanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Sutton v. StephanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Enfield v. Huffman Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Huie v. Soo HooAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1933
- Pacific States Finance Corp. v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931