Legal Opinion
Enfield v. Huffman Motor Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 1953No. Civ. 15365PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Plaintiff, O. E. Enfield, Jr., claiming to be the owner of an automobile in the possession of defendant, the Huffman Motor Company, brought this action for the recovery of the car or its value, and damages for its unlawful detention. The defendants brought in Bonnie Johnson as a party, and asserted a possessory lien in the company for $77.17 for work, labor and materials used or expended in the repair of the ear, and further asserted that such repairs had been ordered by Enfield and Johnson. A counterclaim against Enfield for the value of the work, labor and materials, and for storage, was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoppin v. MunseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Summerville v. Stockton Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Walker v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Lehmann v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Williams v. AsheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- William A. Goichman, on Behalf of Himself and a Class of All Persons Similarly Situated v. Rheuban Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Hohener v. GaussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Bell Foundry Co. v. Lonnie McCurry's Four Wheel Drive Center, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011