Legal Opinion

Welker v. Appleman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1909No. 6,575PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From Steuben Circuit Court; Emmet A. Bratton, Judge. Action by John M. Welker against Squire H. Appleman. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

Appellant sued appellee to recover possesssion of one carload of wool. Appellee admitted that the appellant was the owner of said wool, but claimed the right of possession by reason of a common-law lien for commissions and money advanced in the purchase of the avooI as the agent of appellant, which money he claims was unpaid.

The complaint is in one paragraph in the ordinary form of an action in replevin, to which appellee answered in two paragraphs. The first is a general denial. The second avers that in April, 1906, appellant and appellee entered into an agreement that appellee should…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Haskins v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. McFarland v. WheelerNew York Supreme Court · 1841
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Wiles Laundering Co. v. . HahloNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Yoder Feed Service v. Allied Pullets, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Hitt v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Fort Wayne Iron & Steel Co. v. ParsellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Gifford v. GiffordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. PriddyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API