Mutch v. Long Beach Improvement Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from- a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Russ Avery, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
In an action in which the defendant Long Beach Improvement Company was plaintiff and John B. Mutch, the husband of plaintiff in this action, was defendant, the sheriff of the county of Los Angeles levied an attachment upon an automobile as the property of said John B. Mutch. The property was taken on attachment on Feb ruary 19, 1916. Subsequently the plaintiff here claimed to be the owner of the automobile, and made demand upon the defendant Long Beach Improvement Company for its possession. She made no third party affidavit of ownership nor demand upon the sheriff, under section 689 of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Armstrong & Latta v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Romberg v. HughesNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- George H. Fuller Desk Co. v. McDadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Killey v. ScannellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bonestell v. Western Automotive Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Guerin v. KirstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Booth v. Peoples Finance & Thrift Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
- Avery v. Fredericksen and WestbrookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Stanley W. Smith, Inc. v. PilgrimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.