Legal Opinion
Gray v. Whitmore
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 23, 1971No. Docket Nos. 27565, 28540, 28319PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOLINARI, P. J.
The proceedings before this court involve three separate causes which have been consolidated for determination because they present common questions of law. In Gray v. Whitmore (1 Civ. 27565) and in Dionio v. Carberry (1 Civ. 28540) the respective plaintiffs appeal from an order denying them a preliminary injunction and a peremptory writ of mandate. In Bryson v. Carberry (1 Civ. 28319) a petition for a writ of mandate was filed in this court and we issued an alternative writ of mandate.
Statement of the Cases
Gray v. Whitmore
Plaintiffs were evicted from their Redwood City…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Fujioka Ex Rel. Fujioka v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Coleman v. DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL ADMININISTRATIONCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.