Legal Opinion

Morse v. City of Waterville

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 7, 1990No. C5-90-609PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

This case involves the termination of a public employee in a rural community. On appeal, the City of Waterville and members of its city council argue the trial court abused its discretion in granting temporary injunctive relief. We agree and reverse.

FACTS

Kathleen V. Morse has worked as the city clerk of Waterville since April of 1984. Morse supervised other city employees, prepared minutes of city council meetings, and recorded financial transactions between the city and the general public. In May of 1988, Morse received a Certificate of Appreciation from the city.

On…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Gelco Corp. v. Coniston PartnersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  3. Morton v. BeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Eakman v. BrutgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  2. Hinz v. Neuroscience, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, Inc. v. Toro Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. Minnesota Twins PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API