Legal Opinion
Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, Inc. v. Toro Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 26, 1994No. C6-94-109PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, Inc. (Pacific) was a distributor of products for respondent, The Toro Company (Toro). When Toro decided to terminate Pacific’s distributorship, Pacific sought injunctive relief to prevent Toro from doing so. Pacific argues that the district court erred in denying its temporary injunction motion. Because we conclude that the district court properly evaluated and balanced the five factors set forth in Dahlberg Bros., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 272 Minn. 264, 137 N.W.2d 314 (1965), we affirm.
FACTS
Pacific, a closely held corporation,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Modern Computer Systems, Inc. v. Modern Banking Systems, Inc. Modern Banking Systems of Southern WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- The Original Great American Chocolate Chip Cookie Company, Incorporated v. River Valley Cookies, Limited, Robert M. Sigel, Paula SigelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Upper Midwest Sales Co. v. Ecolab, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. Minnesota Twins PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Randall v. Lady of America Franchise Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
- Red Roof Franchising, LLC v. AA Hospitality Northshore, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- Wave Form Systems, Inc. v. AMS Sales Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.