Legal Opinion

Eakman v. Brutger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 15, 1979No. 49729PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs Marvin Eakman and Thomas McDonald, pro se, appeal from an order of the district court denying their motion for a temporary restraining order enjoining any action taken by defendants Dan Brutger, Chairman of the Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission and John Boland, Chairman of the Metropolitan Council toward the building of a domed stadium in downtown Minneapolis, and granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We consider both rulings. Affirmed.

A trial court’s ruling on a motion for a temporary injunction is largely an exercise of judicial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Lifteau v. Metropolitan Sports Facilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. AAMCO Industries, Inc. v. DeWolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Costley v. Caromin House, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Miller v. FoleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Carl Bolander & Sons Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Sorensen v. Coast-To-Coast Stores (Central Organization), Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API