Legal Opinion
Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 26, 2001No. C0-00-1461, C8-00-1563PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge *
This case arises out of a noncompete agreement between appellant Mark Stultz and respondent Medtronic, Inc., his former employer. Stultz’s new employer, appellant Advanced Bionics Corporation, and Stultz brought a complaint in California Superior Court challenging the agreement, and Medtronic brought a complaint in Minnesota district court seeking enforcement. This is a consolidated appeal from several orders for temporary injunctions. Advanced Bionics and Stultz challenge the injunction order and the exercise of jurisdiction by Minnesota. Because we agree with…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- County Materials Corp. v. Allan Block Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Cpi Card Grp., Inc. v. John Dwyer, Multi Packaging Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2017
- Superior Edge, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- Sensient Colors Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Danielson v. National Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.