Legal Opinion

Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical Examiners

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 20, 1994No. C5-94-1090PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

This case questions the authority of the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice (“board”) to require a licensed physician to submit to an examination under Minn.Stat. § 147.091, subd. 6(a) (1992). On appeal from the trial court’s denial of her request for temporary injunctive relief, Dr. Diane Hume-nansky argues: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in concluding that an examination would cause her inconvenience but not irreparable harm; and (2) Minn.Stat. § 147.091, subd. 6(a) is unconstitutionally vague and violates her constitutional rights to be free from…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bland v. Commission on Medical CompetencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. CUP Foods, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. City of Ramsey v. HolmbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. State v. MellettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API