Humenansky v. Minnesota Board of Medical Examiners
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
This case questions the authority of the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice (“board”) to require a licensed physician to submit to an examination under Minn.Stat. § 147.091, subd. 6(a) (1992). On appeal from the trial court’s denial of her request for temporary injunctive relief, Dr. Diane Hume-nansky argues: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in concluding that an examination would cause her inconvenience but not irreparable harm; and (2) Minn.Stat. § 147.091, subd. 6(a) is unconstitutionally vague and violates her constitutional rights to be free from…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Bland v. Commission on Medical CompetencyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- CUP Foods, Inc. v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- City of Ramsey v. HolmbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. MellettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.